Practice Deliberation:
- On and off campus issues
- Higher than national average of food insecure
- Skepticism towards Penn State having a that large of a food insecurity
- Approach one: Penn State
- Meal plans
- Can change the levels or add donations
- Never seen one of the kiosks for meal plan donations
- Having a better place to purchase the food that is wanted to be cooked
- Cleanliness after cooking and theft (leaving college freshmen alone to cook)
- Having someone in change of the kitchens-student employment option
- Approach two: State College
- Current initiatives and past initiatives
- Abba java coffee house and St. Andrews community cafe (current)
- Full meals (sunday night and thursday brunch)
- There is a take home option
- Community partners
- Penn State can’t advertise due to risk
- If you don’t feel food insecure should you still feel able to go
- This has to to with breaking the stigma- includes the entire community
- Inclusive Housing: people that can’t afford housing to lower housing cost ( the imposition of a tax)
- How to incentivize (wealth tax)
- Approach three: State government (through federal government)
- SNAP
- Change the criteria to be more inclusive (OR criteria)(stimulates economic growth)
- SNAP is a debit card federal government gives you (replaces paper food stamps)- only used for food
- Does it have different levels of assistance
- How to address the problem of college being a choice
- Reduction in taxpayer money on medicaid (with healthier eating choices)
- Notes during the deliberation
- Deliberation Outline
- Food insecurity is a problem that many college students face today
- This problem is not only limited to underprivileged students but students that don’t have access to nutritious food.
- Embarrassment : because they can’t provide for themselves
- Support Groups/ therapy for the food insecure
- There are two categories of food insecurity:
- Skipping meals or not eating enough
- Lack of access to nutritious food
- It’s important to acknowledge that food insecurity is not limited to Penn State students but students across the US.
- Time, money, resources, policy reform
APPROACH ONE: Penn State Level- Meal Point Donation System: week before the end of the semester
- Change in the number of meal plans available: tailor their meal plans as they need to
- Updates in residence hall kitchens: hiring students to clean the dishes in the residence halls
- Reducing the stigma around food in security
- Healthy food options
APPROACH TWO: State College Level- Expand community efforts like Abba Java and State College Food Bank
- Wealth tax: to subsidize food for the food insecure.
- Redistribution of money to aid in funding the wealth tax
APPROACH THREE: GOV Level- State government
- Lowering conditions for SNAP eligibility so that more people receive there benefits
positives:- lowers eligibility for SNAP to make it more accessible for students
- stimulates local economic growth
- places primary burden of payment on the wealthiest
negatives:- does not cover all students who may face food insecurity
- mainly for purchasing food from stores and may not apply to meal plans
- only offsets costs instead of relieving them entirely
Deliberation Notes:- Shock one in two people are food insecure
- Clearly there is a broken system
- Money disappears at the add of the second semester
- A lot food waste
- Price of housing could go towards stock
- Advertising/ Lack knowledge
- Problem paying for food
- Having Lion’s Pantry and The Farm Club pass out free food to all Penn State students (in an attempt to reduce the stigma and increase access to nutritous food)
Comments
Post a Comment